
ReVolt – 技術問答
ReVolt 正在解决好莱坞片場的排放問題,下一步將把可擕式 DC 電源應用於建築工地、應急回應事件等領域
尊敬的用戶:
為了改進 Vicor 網站,我們將於美國東部時間 12 月 29 日上午 11:30 至下午 2:00 對網站進行維護。
在此期間,您可能無法查看網站的某些部分,特別是產品頁面和產品型號清單。
對於給您帶來的不便,我們深表歉意,並感謝您的耐心等待。
– Vicor 網站團隊
Buck voltage regulation, an essential part of distributing power from a DC supply to its points of load (PoLs), has typically been implemented with a PWM circuit. The PWM duty cycle is varied to accommodate the required voltage reduction.
However a couple of factors have applied increasing pressure to regulator design. Firstly, power density is being forced up as continuously more powerful devices are designed onto boards without corresponding increase in footprint. Secondly, DC power supply voltage levels are tending to rise to minimize distribution losses, while device voltages are reducing to increase internal speed and efficiency. These trends combine to increase the voltage drop and associated switching losses across the regulator.
For example a process control system may call for regulation from 24V to 3.3V – a gap that would typically be covered using two regulation stages; increasing board space, cost and reliability issues. The regulator’s switching frequency is also limited, as increased switching activity incurs more losses. This in turn limits the use of smaller passive components for filtering, penalizing the density of the total solution.
Although high-density PWM regulators have evolved with improved IC integration, MOSFETs and packaging, their design is no longer sufficient to meet the power demands they face. This is mainly due to switching losses within the regulator MOSFETs. These must be overcome or avoided to achieve any significant boost to regulator performance.
A better solution uses zero-voltage-switching (ZVS) topology, which allows for operation at a higher frequency and at higher input voltages without sacrificing efficiency. While still PWM based, a separate phase is added to the PWM timing to allow for ZVS operation. Figure 1 compares a conventional buck regulator with a version modified for ZVS operation. Utilizing the added phase, the ZVS type uses the clamp switch and circuit resonance to operate the high side (Q1) and synchronous (Q2) MOSFETs efficiently with soft switching, avoiding the losses they incur during conventional PWM operation and timing.
For example in the conventional circuit, as Q1 is turned on and Q2 turned off, a very high current flows through the MOSFET pair, since Q2’s body diode appears as a short circuit during its reverse recovery time. Other losses arise due to discharging Q1’s output capacitance, and to reverse recovery in Q2. These losses increase as the switching frequency or input voltage increases.
By contrast the ZVS design addresses the high turn-on losses of the conventional regulator by eliminating high current body diode conduction prior to turn on of the high-side MOSFET, bringing the D-S voltage of the high side MOSFET to zero or nearly zero and producing no high current spikes or damaging ringing. The ZVS action applied to Q1 removes its Miller effect at turn on, allowing the use of a smaller driver and lower gate drive.
Vicor has utilized ZVS topology within our buck regulators. These provide regulation up to 36VIN at a higher efficiency and from a smaller form factor than achievable from conventional hard switching, high density regulators.
Figure 1: ZVS Buck
Related content
Product overview: buck regulators
ReVolt – 技術問答
ReVolt 正在解决好莱坞片場的排放問題,下一步將把可擕式 DC 電源應用於建築工地、應急回應事件等領域
雙向供電與快速瞬態回應能力賦能可擴充的主動懸架系統
正弦振幅轉換器™ (SAC™) 模組憑藉其獨特的雙向供電功能與瞬態回應速度組合,為主動懸架系統開闢了全新可能性
提供更高的峰值功率和更快的動態瞬態回應,實現更輕、更强大的電動汽車架構
隨著時間的推移,市場上的電動汽車(EV)對電驅動系統的依賴程度日益加深,例如線控轉向、線控制動以及主動懸架系統等
電流倍增器:為 AI 處理器及其他嚴苛應用供電的明智之選
AI 處理器需要解决低電壓、高電流的嚴苛挑戰,這將會導致電源系統設計產生瓶頸。瞭解 Vicor 的電流倍增技術如何改變這一現狀

