Six questions to consider before designing your robot’s power architecture
Outpace your competition by innovating the power delivery network
The mobile robotics industry is rapidly growing and evolving. With a projected market of nearly $30B by 2023 [World Robotics 2020] the robots manufactured in the near future will address a wide variety of markets by solving well-known and yet-to-be-discovered problems. They already do more than just move from point A to point B: they make real-time decisions based on environmental inputs and their own mission parameters.
The power deliver network is power-dense and scalable
Providing these capabilities requires motors, sensors and processing subsystems, but to keep ahead of the competition the robot’s platform must be capable of quickly upgrading these components as better options become available. To do that quickly while maintaining size, weight and cost targets requires an optimized power delivery network (PDN) that can scale to meet changing requirements. Considering the questions below will help you arrive at the best answers for your platform. In doing so you will be able to design a better PDN for your mobile robot that endures whatever changes your company will face as your mission parameters evolve.
1. Is your battery optimized for lightweight, low-loss power distribution?
You worry about the economics of your battery (cost, supply, lifecycle) and the longevity (cycle count, aging), but have you considered that the voltage you use impacts the overall weight of your design?
It’s a simple fact (due to Ohm’s Law) that you can reduce cable weight by distributing power at a high voltage and thus a low current, which requires a smaller (and lighter!) cable. Smaller and lighter cables also have less resistance relative to larger sizes, which reduces the amount of wasted heat in your system. For these reasons, there are a lot of 48V-based (and higher!) battery power architectures compared to lower 12V solutions, and there are efficient, lightweight converters available: both the fixed ratio BCM and the regulated DCM converters.
2. Is the PDN optimized for time between charges with the current and the future payloads?
Your platform will evolve: processors get faster, motors/actuators get more numerous, sensor arrays demand more power with expanded capabilities. Do you want to redesign your PDN every time you swap out a subsystem?
Instead of redesigning your PDN, you can increase the overall battery capacity using additional cells in parallel for more energy storage at the same PDN source voltage. Now you don’t have to redesign with a different voltage and deal with the ripple effect of that change throughout your platform. To optimize your PDN for the future, pick a battery distribution voltage that is high – at least 48V – and with a discharge profile that allows the use of a fixed-ratio converter when you need to power a subsystem. Fixed-ratio converters are the most efficient, smallest size, lightest weight converters for step-down conversion. Your PDN can place these small modular converters wherever you need to convert 48 to 12V or from 800V to a SELV voltage, for example.
3. Are dynamic loads adding unnecessary weight to your system?
A brute-force approach to powering dynamic loads is to size the distribution of the PDN for the maximum load power, but if the load has a low duty cycle, a significant weight is added by a large cable to meet the need. Instead of a large cable, an alternative could be to add local energy storage near the point-of-load with a nearby capacitor that can provide the power when needed. However, there may be a better option to optimize your PDN: a fixed-ratio converter. These converters can function like an ideal transformer and have the benefit of reflecting capacitance from input to output (also works output to input). This means that the capacitance on the input appears as if it is capacitance on the output scaled by the same ratio as the converter’s conversion K factor. The lightest weight solution will use a small capacitive value on the input of a fixed ratio converter instead of a converter followed by a much larger capacitor.
4. Should you plan for autonomous control?
Automating tasks is essential to efficiency improvements, so even if your robot presently has human control, it’s likely that some of those human-controlled tasks will be automated in the future. Looking at current machine learning/artificial intelligence hardware shows that the power demands can be daunting, but Vicor solutions are already meeting those requirements. Planning for some additional power capability now (remember #2!) will help you scale easily when you are ready to integrate AI into your enhanced capabilities.
5. Battery vs. tether?
Do not underestimate the advantages of a tethered design, especially if you have a bounded area of operation, like a factory, warehouse or an arena. In fact, robots (both piloted and autonomous) have used tethered power systems, which can deliver kilowatts of power over a small-diameter cable. As the graph below illustrates, higher voltages allow for more power over the same size (and weight) cable.
Since the tether allows for indefinite operating time, you can increase the voltage (to 400V, 800V or higher) to provide more power as your needs to support a broader range of capabilities (sensors, data gathering, etc.) on the platform. While this keeps the cable light, don’t forget that lightweight converters still give you even more advantages – remember #1 & #3?
6. Does your modularity add value?
Common interfaces enable modularity by standardizing on mechanics, data interfaces and power. Providing modularity at the FRU level of your system improves the maintainability in the field. However, it is possible that at some point your interface will lag behind the capabilities that you may want to include in your system. For example, 12V had been the standard distribution voltage in computing and automotive PDNs for decades, but now 48V is becoming popular as power levels rise. To extend the value of modularity you can use converters that allow for efficient conversion in the PDN while maintaining the interfaces. Going back to the 48-to-12V example, the NBM2317 is a great example of a product that bridges 12 and 48V with bidirectional, high-efficiency conversion.
A better way to deliver power
These six questions will guide you down a path toward designing a PDN that:
- Distributes power with minimal thermal and mass impact
- Disperses heat to facilitate cooling
- Decouples PDN dependency battery voltage by allowing expanded battery capacity
- Provides PDN expandability (power, capability, autonomous control)
- Uses common interfaces to enable modularity for scaling up in capability in the future
Read more on how Vicor powers mobile robots using module power components that optimize robotic capabilities.